Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: chrisGood idea? Bad idea? Want to help?
Posted By: vladimir
In regards to codecs and such, I have a question: Why can't distros release a version for The Rest Of The World and a version for the USA? Linux is developed by people throughout the world, why should those living under saner legal systems be indirectly subject to US intellectual property laws? That said, over here in Australia we are going to get hit with the DMCA too :-(.
Posted By: kiwiboyusSounds good David :)
You know I could do a KDE desktop if there was a way to make it clean like Gnome but I guess thats the point of of having different approaches right?
Posted By: DavidNielsenit's my birthday today
Posted By: barbwireHey David - why 64 bit?
A couple of problems I had with F7 (minor I know - but enough to discourage my continued use) was nautilus not having the left-hand directory tree, and being unable to assign+{X} for global hot keys. If these can be altered in the build (in a x86 build) I would definitely look forward to transitioning off Ubuntu!
Posted By: DavidNielsenPosted By: barbwireHey David - why 64 bit?
A couple of problems I had with F7 (minor I know - but enough to discourage my continued use) was nautilus not having the left-hand directory tree, and being unable to assign+{X} for global hot keys. If these can be altered in the build (in a x86 build) I would definitely look forward to transitioning off Ubuntu!
Easy, my machine is 64bit and I run everything on this.. every new machine sold is 64bit, I'd rather focus on hardware I have and hardware that can run all these badass features like games, compiz and wonder crack. Naturally this is a prototype, once I confirm that this works I'll crank out livecds and install cds for i386 and x86_64. Running i386 on a 64bit machine feels... dirty.
Posted By: vladimir
Happy Birthday :-). Btw, do w32codecs work with 64bit?
Posted By: DavidNielsenOkay, I caved.. I started building a prototype LasNIX on F7 x86_64 with the the livna repos enabled. I plan a basic GNOME desktop with compiz, codecs, all the virtualization goodies, a few good games.. and the nvidia driver (there's still a problem with the ati driver in terms of AIGLX support and it doesn't coexist with the nvidia one). Just a prototype to see how much work needs to be done to met 80% of Chris' goals
Posted By: vladimirPosted By: DavidNielsenOkay, I caved.. I started building a prototype LasNIX on F7 x86_64 with the the livna repos enabled. I plan a basic GNOME desktop with compiz, codecs, all the virtualization goodies, a few good games.. and the nvidia driver (there's still a problem with the ati driver in terms of AIGLX support and it doesn't coexist with the nvidia one). Just a prototype to see how much work needs to be done to met 80% of Chris' goals
A Fedora question. I installed a Rawhide (post Test4) of FC7 and added the Livna repository. I installed the Nvidia modules and then later I was prompted to install some updates. These updates included a kernel update from the official Fedora repo - however there were no updated Nvidia modules available from Livna. Now to a new user, they wouldn't know to check the versions of the new kernel to ensure there is a corresponding module from Livna. It seemed to me like their dependency checking somehow failed to detect that upgrading my kernel would kill my X - was this just a bug in the rawhide at the time, or will Fedora's updater still prompt you to kernel update even when matching Livna modules are unavailable (and hence kill your X)?
Posted By: DavidNielsenLasNIX Prototype- expect really shit seeding, I'm having a few issues with my ISP capping bittorrent upload.
Posted By: BryanPosted By: DavidNielsenLasNIX Prototype- expect really shit seeding, I'm having a few issues with my ISP capping bittorrent upload.
Cool man! Though, I just want to make sure everyone is clear, this isn't an official LASnix build. :) We're not quite at the official build stage yet.
Posted By: i0nullI think that this distribution primary focus should not be aimed at the 'technical' audience, but rather the 'general user'.
Posted By: ebeyerWill you have different flavors of LASnix depending on desktop environment, like LASnix, KLASnix, XLASnix?
Posted By: i0nullI think that this distribution primary focus should not be aimed at the 'technical' audience, but rather the 'general user'
Posted By: andersonmanlyI guess I look at this as more as a geeky distro project and less of a formal distro.
Posted By: Garfunkelone of the things that could really set LASnix above all other distros is the intro sound/music.
Posted By: i0null
Also, about the codecs: it may be a good idea to install VLC as the default media player as it can handle most multimedia formats on the planet, it is licensed under the GPL) and the user may also be familiar with it on one of the other many platforms that it supports.
Posted By: lawabbIf its going to be the coolest distro on the block, it should be KDE4 based, right?
Posted By: hammerandbank
easy configuration transfer between LASinux users
"check out my new .... its pretty sweet... I'll send it to you" other side "WOW it configured it for me so its just like your!"
Posted By: El_DiabloWhat does everyone think of having LASnix have a native GUI management for joining an AD domain? I am a developer and I could help make this happen. Also, what about having WINE pre-installed and pre-configured?
Posted By: chrisPosted By: El_DiabloWhat does everyone think of having LASnix have a native GUI management for joining an AD domain? I am a developer and I could help make this happen. Also, what about having WINE pre-installed and pre-configured?
I like both of those ideas. LASnix is going to take a practical approach to this kind of stuff. As much as we would love the facts to be different, the corporate world has a heck of a lot of Microsoft in it. Heck, the whole world in general. So we have got to play well with this kind of stuff.
When I first starting using Linux at my day job, my boss only let me run Xandros Pro, thanks to it's built in AD support.
-Chris
Posted By: RyanQuick question, is it illegal to distribute the codecs on the cd? (In the US, i'm the sexy UK so I'm okay but) and then when the user wants to play a file say "this is illegal; press install if you don't mind" and then install them from the cd? rather than it have it pull them from online?